<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress Multi User and ad hoc communities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benwerd.com/2009/05/wordpress-mu-and-ad-hoc-communities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benwerd.com/2009/05/wordpress-mu-and-ad-hoc-communities/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 09:51:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alevin</title>
		<link>http://benwerd.com/2009/05/wordpress-mu-and-ad-hoc-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-25701</link>
		<dc:creator>alevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benwerd.com/2009/05/wordpress-and-wordpress-mu-to-merge-but-whats-next/#comment-25701</guid>
		<description>Ad hoc communities are an increasing part of the mix.  As a volunteer organizer, I am very skeptical of predictions that all communities will go ad hoc.  There is a need for persistent communities for mentoring, learning, affiliation, communication that won&#039;t go away.  We need both. 

The model of centralized community is broken though, it doesn&#039;t model how people affiliate.  So we need tools to support decentralized and, ad hoc communities, and affordances to bring some of the coalescing dust clouds into solar systems as planets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ad hoc communities are an increasing part of the mix.  As a volunteer organizer, I am very skeptical of predictions that all communities will go ad hoc.  There is a need for persistent communities for mentoring, learning, affiliation, communication that won&#8217;t go away.  We need both. </p>
<p>The model of centralized community is broken though, it doesn&#8217;t model how people affiliate.  So we need tools to support decentralized and, ad hoc communities, and affordances to bring some of the coalescing dust clouds into solar systems as planets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzi Dafnis</title>
		<link>http://benwerd.com/2009/05/wordpress-mu-and-ad-hoc-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-24504</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzi Dafnis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 07:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benwerd.com/2009/05/wordpress-and-wordpress-mu-to-merge-but-whats-next/#comment-24504</guid>
		<description>Hi. I was really interested in your article and the idea of the transient community. 

We are a community of businesswomen located in all corners of a big (but sparse country), Australia. I have played with the idea of creating a place that allows members to interact more... our own social network.

After looking at these questions:
&#039;Do members need one more place to go to sign in and interact - especially if they are already on Facebook etc. 

&quot;What is that my environment will offer that will keep them engaged?&#039;, 

&#039;Can I just let them let others in the community know about the communities they are a part of already? ie. be a conduit for them to connect, but not the place the activity happens&#039;

... I&#039;m pretty much decided not to develop a community that is persistent, but to create temporary communities around events, discussions etc.

I don&#039;t think I can create the next best social network. But, I do think that when members come together around an &#039;event&#039; they can get a lot out of that experience.


We&#039;ve had good success running webinars where (like skype) people come online at a particular time around a particular subject and interact (we open up lines, allow them to chat etc and share resrouces) and then when it&#039;s over, it&#039;s over. We DO send them to a closed door community or forum at that point for further resources and discussion.

I&#039;m interested to see the evolution of the transient community. I think it is the way to go.

Suzi Dafnis
Community Director - Australian Businesswomen&#039;s Network</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I was really interested in your article and the idea of the transient community. </p>
<p>We are a community of businesswomen located in all corners of a big (but sparse country), Australia. I have played with the idea of creating a place that allows members to interact more&#8230; our own social network.</p>
<p>After looking at these questions:<br />
&#8216;Do members need one more place to go to sign in and interact &#8211; especially if they are already on Facebook etc. </p>
<p>&#8220;What is that my environment will offer that will keep them engaged?&#8217;, </p>
<p>&#8216;Can I just let them let others in the community know about the communities they are a part of already? ie. be a conduit for them to connect, but not the place the activity happens&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8230; I&#8217;m pretty much decided not to develop a community that is persistent, but to create temporary communities around events, discussions etc.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think I can create the next best social network. But, I do think that when members come together around an &#8216;event&#8217; they can get a lot out of that experience.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve had good success running webinars where (like skype) people come online at a particular time around a particular subject and interact (we open up lines, allow them to chat etc and share resrouces) and then when it&#8217;s over, it&#8217;s over. We DO send them to a closed door community or forum at that point for further resources and discussion.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested to see the evolution of the transient community. I think it is the way to go.</p>
<p>Suzi Dafnis<br />
Community Director &#8211; Australian Businesswomen&#8217;s Network</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://benwerd.com/2009/05/wordpress-mu-and-ad-hoc-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-24255</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 02:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benwerd.com/2009/05/wordpress-and-wordpress-mu-to-merge-but-whats-next/#comment-24255</guid>
		<description>Installing BuddyPress is easy as cake, you can even do it from the one-click plugin installer. Integrating bbPress is harder, that takes a lucky 13 steps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Installing BuddyPress is easy as cake, you can even do it from the one-click plugin installer. Integrating bbPress is harder, that takes a lucky 13 steps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordPress Multi User and ad hoc communities &#124; Ben Werdmuller &#124; Bloggers Tools</title>
		<link>http://benwerd.com/2009/05/wordpress-mu-and-ad-hoc-communities/comment-page-1/#comment-24246</link>
		<dc:creator>WordPress Multi User and ad hoc communities &#124; Ben Werdmuller &#124; Bloggers Tools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 23:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benwerd.com/2009/05/wordpress-and-wordpress-mu-to-merge-but-whats-next/#comment-24246</guid>
		<description>[...] rest is here: WordPress Multi User and ad hoc communities &#124; Ben Werdmuller You May Like Linking To UsHello and welcome to our blog, you may consider linking to us, because [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rest is here: WordPress Multi User and ad hoc communities | Ben Werdmuller You May Like Linking To UsHello and welcome to our blog, you may consider linking to us, because [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
