<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ben Werdmuller von Elgg &#187; women in tech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benwerd.com/tag/women-in-tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benwerd.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 09:55:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gender differences on the new frontier</title>
		<link>http://benwerd.com/2009/03/gender-differences-on-the-new-frontier/</link>
		<comments>http://benwerd.com/2009/03/gender-differences-on-the-new-frontier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Werdmuller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women in tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benwerd.com/2009/03/gender-differences-on-the-new-frontier/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a commonly accepted fact that computing is a male-dominated industry, but I was shocked by the scale of the inequality. Okay, this is kind of unscientific, but take a look at these statistics: Female population of the world: 49.8% Female population of Facebook: 55% Female population of social networks as a whole: 54.7% Percentage [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/90921086@N00/85335604/"><img alt="" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/9/85335604_bcb94f38aa_m.jpg" align="right" /></a> It&#8217;s a commonly accepted fact that computing is a male-dominated industry, but I was shocked by the scale of the inequality. Okay, this is kind of unscientific, but take a look at these statistics:</p>
<ul>
<li>Female population of the world: <a href="https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/xx.html#People">49.8%</a> </li>
<li>Female population of Facebook: <a href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2008/09/18/latest-data-on-us-facebook-age-and-gender-demographics/">55%</a> </li>
<li>Female population of social networks as a whole: <a href="http://business.rapleaf.com/company_press_2008_07_29.html">54.7%</a> </li>
<li><strong>Percentage of people awarded undergraduate computer science degrees by PhD-granting institutions in the US and Canada in 2006-7 who were women: </strong><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/16/business/16digi.html"><strong>12%</strong></a> </li>
</ul>
<p>While social media usage is skewed ever so slightly towards women, a whopping 88% of the people who study to learn the skills to build these tools are men. This is at a time when, in science generally, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_science#Statistics">women receiving undergraduate degrees are increasing as a percentage year on year</a>.</p>
<p>Some of the reasons for this have been covered a lot over the past year. This 2007 <a href="http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2007-05-07-n78.html">interview with Aaron Swartz</a> (who worked on Creative Commons and is now behind the awesome government site <a href="http://watchdog.net/">Watchdog.net</a>) contains some interesting thoughts on discrimination on the basis of both gender and race:</p>
<blockquote><p>If you talk to any woman in the tech community, it won&#8217;t be long before they start telling you stories about disgusting, sexist things guys have said to them. It freaks them out; and rightly so. As a result, the only women you see in tech are those who are willing to put up with all the abuse.</p>
<p>[...] The denial about this in the tech community is so great that sometimes I despair of it ever getting fixed. [...] It&#8217;s an institutional problem, not a personal one.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Last year, Chris Messina <a href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2007/05/08/we-found-women-in-tech-so-why-are-you-still-not-reporting-about-them/">called out a BusinessWeek article</a> for disproportionately featuring the male participants at <a href="http://socialtext.net/web2open">Web2Open</a>, a Web 2.0 technology unconference <a href="http://www.horsepigcow.com/">Tara Hunt</a> had predominantly organized. He followed it up this month with another post about <a href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/02/27/future-of-white-boys-clubs-redux-fowaspeak/">the Future of Web Apps as a white boys&#8217; club</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Turns out, white men also <a href="http://twitter.com/chrismessina/status/1245630066">don&#8217;t have the monopoly</a> on the <a href="http://shesgeeky.org/">best speakers</a> &#8211; even in the tech industry &#8211; yet their ilk continue to make up a highly disproportionate number of the folks who end up on stage. And that means that good content and good ideas and important perspectives aren&#8217;t making it into the mix that should be, and as a result, audiences are getting short-changed.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This isn&#8217;t just about technology, and it isn&#8217;t just about the commercial web. We&#8217;re in an era where everything is going online; Barack Obama would arguably not be President of the United States without his engagement with grassroots social media technologies, and he is certainly <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_social_media_advantage.php">continuing to embrace them into his Presidency</a>. Yet if those technologies are effectively controlled by a minority of the population, that population&#8217;s biases and predispositions seep into how they&#8217;re designed, how they&#8217;re built, and ultimately how they work in practice.</p>
<p>Although I&#8217;ve picked out gender here, the same is doubtless true regarding race and sexuality discrimination in the tech sector, although the numbers haven&#8217;t been as widely published. As computing becomes more and more important in society as a whole, it becomes more and more important to ensure the people who help shape it are selected fairly and represent a cross-section of the people it serves.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> Lots of really interesting links in the comments, including Katie Piatt&#8217;s recommendation of <a href="http://findingada.com/">Ada Lovelace Day</a>, which encourages people to blog about women in tech.</p>
<p><a href="http://maymay.net/blog/">Meitar Moscovitz</a> points me to <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_the_semantic_web_have_a_g.php">Will the Semantic Web Have a Gender?</a>, a ReadWriteWeb article from last year about the possibility that the semantic web will reflect a predominantly male attitude to the world.</p>
<p><em>Image by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mouton/">mouton.rebelle</a> and released under a CC-Attribution-Noncommercial license.</em></p>
<h3>Related entries</h3>
<ul class="related_post">
<li><a href="http://benwerd.com/2009/03/the-mechanics-of-open/" title="The mechanics of &quot;open&quot;">The mechanics of &quot;open&quot; (0)</a></li>
</ul>
<br /><a href="http://benwerd.com/2009/03/gender-differences-on-the-new-frontier/#comments" title="Comments on &quot;Gender differences on the new frontier&quot;"><img src="http://benwerd.com/wp-content/plugins/feed-comments-number/image.php?604" alt="Comments" /></a> <img src="http://benwerd.com/wp-content/plugins/feed-statistics.php?view=1&post_id=604" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://benwerd.com/2009/03/gender-differences-on-the-new-frontier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
